Another NWO lie dismantled: Population problem is not explosion – but implosion
While I’m not posting this because I think everything in it is 100% accurate, it raises some very good points – firstly that one of the big reasons for making up the “global warming” false flag is to assist with a eugenics agenda. And it’s a pretty safe bet that neither the temperature or global population will be higher in 100 years.
The Illuminati are about to reduce the overpopulation of the world, which they see as nightmarish – to 500 million, as they put it on the Georgia Guidestones. Their reason: 7+ billion people are difficult to govern for their one-world government / Agenda 21. As a pretext, they invented their tall tale about global warming, which is said to be caused by the “cancer of the earth,” humanity. Many methods have been tried: epidemics such as AIDS and influenza, tetanus vaccination of women of reproductive age only, food as a weapon for lowering the birth rate. War on terror and drugs as well as genocidal practices such as revolutions and major wars financed by these forces were and are being triggered by the elite and their politician-henchmen. Rothschild´s Goldman Sachs’ creative inventions with tremendous purchase of grain futures is a prime example: The grain is stored until the price has increased five-fold and the poor cannot afford to buy it, after which they starve. The whole game is reinforced by “replication”: With only $ 5 they can keep grain futures worth $ 100.
The elite wants sterilization of people – even demanding certificates to have children. They support abortions – even “abortions after birth”, that is, to kill unwanted normal or sick babies. China’s one-child policy is seen as ideal.
Bill Gates is sorry to be able to reduce the world’s population by only 15% by “medical care and vaccinations”! In reality, their greatest wish is for humanity to grow out of existence.
This wishful dream seems to be coming true. There is no population bomb, but a population implosion!
Well-known investigative journalist F. William Engdahl proves that even the “overpopulation nightmare” is just another lie.
Anywhere outside the Muslim world, birth rates are falling dramatically, far below the 2.1 children/woman, which is necessary to maintain the present population.
In its 2008 AR4, the governmental NGO in UN staging, the IPCC, notorious through the the Climategate scandal and other climate lies, alleged to the politicians of the world there would be food shortage because of (non-existent) global warming droughts.
Well, facts now show that the increase in atmospheric CO2 from a preindustrial 0.027% to now 0.4% – a) has not been accompanied by a global temperature increase since the turn of the century, and b) CO2 acts as an atmospheric fertilizer, greening the earth, and year after year new crops records are recorded.
But this was not discussed at the recent UN Climate Conference in Lima. Instead, it was claimed that CO2 had a devastating effect on food production
The Times 24 May 2009 had a remarkable story: “Bill Gates gathers his billionaire friends of the “Good Club” including David Rockefeller Jr., Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey. These members have given away more than £45 billion since 1996 to causes ranging from health programmes in developing countries to ghetto schools nearer to home.
A consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat. “This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,” said the guest. “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”
The following 2 graphs are from a Pew Research study
Their methods vary from covertly making women infertile by “Tetanus Vaccinations” (WHO, Rockefeller, Norwegian government) and food for population reduction to more direct genocidal methods and here. Some hope mankind will breed itself out of existence by having fewer and fewer babies. They think Population reduction is the best way to stop global warming! Circles in the US medical industry seem to have been up to several attempts to reduce mankind – by accident or – as many think – on purpose. The US military is said to have developed AIDS as a biological weapon at Fort Detrick – a CIA program called MK-NAOMI by the Special Operations Division of the Army. It was then spread with hepatitis B vaccine among homosexuals.
Goldman Sachs is Rothschild´s foremost investment bank, Rothschild owning the controlling equity. That´s why CEO Lloyd Blankfein says “I`m doing God´s (Rothschild´s) work”.
I have previously described how they buy and store grain to let the price go up – before they sell it.
Ellen Brown writes: By their Commodity Index Fund, they simply began a. to buy, buy, buy and store wheat and to prolong futures into new futures. This accumulation led to b. a “demand shock” in the markets. …driving prices up. Hard Red wheat is normally traded at 3 to 6 dollars per bushel. The price rose to 25 dollars a bushel … Paradoxically, 2008 was the year with the biggest wheat harvest in history …The index is so constructed, that the price can never fall.
The other monstrosity is…”Replication”: You give me 100 dollars into my hand … I would be to invest these 100 dollars in the wheat market. But that’s not necessary. It is sufficient if I invest $ 5 … With these five dollars I can hold a 100-dollar position. So now I still have 95 of your dollars … Goldman and all the other banks have invested hundreds of billions of dollars in very conservative investments … and now that they have for hundreds of billions of T-Bills, they can invest them into trillions of dollars … Then they take this trillion of dollars, they pass on to their day traders and tell them: ‘Come on, guys. Make it the most lucrative business. So, while billions of people are Blankfein-Goldman-sachs-starving, they are using the money to generate billions of dollars for their own accounts.”
Bill Gates claims to be able to reduce the world´s population by only 15% through medical care and vaccinations! (Hopefully, he means to say that as more children survive, less will be produced!? – which in Muslim circles is a sin and a utopia.
Now, F. William Engdahl has made further Research and comes to the opposite conclusion:
The real story about our global population is radically different as from the picture the mainstream media would lead us to believe.
Listen to David Rockefeller deploring that life expectancy has increased dramatically (He will complete his 100. anniversary this year!!) because the population growth is a nightmare to theseMaster race people. He mentions the need for the UN to rule also this “problem” by stabilizing populations to prevent degradation of the biosphere.
In the course of my (Engdahl´s) research I came across documented evidence that the Rockefeller Foundation had not only financed much of the work of Margaret Sanger and her eugenics Planned Parenthood organization during the 1930’s, when her “Negro Project” in black Harlem was trying to develop ways to eliminate the black population. The same Rockefeller Foundation at the same time financed the work of the various experiments of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin and Munich during the Third Reich. They knew exactly what barbarism they were supporting—ways to eliminate the “unfit.”
In June 1952 John D. Rockefeller III convened a secret conference at Williamsburg, Virginia, where some thirty of the nation’s most eminent conservationists, public health experts, Planned Parenthood leaders, agriculturalists, demographers and social scientists met. They formed a new group which could act as “a coordinating and catalytic agent in the broad field of population.” John D. Rockefeller III publicly christened The Population Council and announced that he himself would serve as its first president. They organized their vast financial and media resources to spread the myth of over-population that today is blindly accepted by most as scientific truth. They spread the myth that “people pollute,” or as the Rockefeller Foundation’s Alan Gregg preferred to describe growing human populations in the developing world, “cancerous growths that demand food.” Population reduction became the strategic priority, step-wise, of the US Government and then the US-controlled World Bank.
The Rockefeller-financed research into cheap, effective birth control, and other eugenics projects resulted in the US Government, officially and secretly, making reduction of population growth in key raw material rich developing countries like Brazil, India, Nigeria and Indonesia the explicit USA Government policy. “No population control, no USAID money.” Henry Kissinger drafted the document for it, NSSM-200, titled, ‘Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests,’ and President Gerald Ford signed it as Government policy in 1975.
The mainstream media that has been controlled by Rockefellers and their eugenics-loving very rich and very loveless friends for decades, pumped us full of the myth that the world was a human “population bomb” in the early 1970’s.
Comment: Today, Rockefeller´s UN is pushing depopulation politics – supported by Obama´s science “czar” John Holdren (right). He wrote a book in 1977 called Ecoscience in which he indicated support for forced abortions, sterilization through infertility drugs or through the nation’s drinking water or food, having babies seized from single mothers or teen mothers and given away to couples, requiring that “people who contribute to social deterioration…be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” (i.e. more forced abortions or sterilizations), and creating a transnational “Planetary Regime” that controls the global economy and dictates the details of American lives by use of an armed international police force.
End of the American Dream. The elite wants to enforce sterilization of people – even to issue permissions to have babies. They promote abortions – even “after birth abortions” meaning to kill unwanted normal or sick babies.
However, the world is facing, not a population bomb, but a population implosion.
It is well established death rates, that an average 2.1 live births per woman are required to maintain population equilibrium.
In Germany, the birthrate has sunk to just 1.36, worse even than low-fertility Spain (1.48) and Italy (1.4). Western Europe as a whole will most likely shrink from 460 million to just 350 million by the end of the century. And barring dramatic reversal of the foolish One (sometimes Two) Child Policy, China’s population will be reduced in half.
Right: A UN and a US census demographic estimate of population development till 2100 A.D.
Even the USA where a large immigrant Hispanic population immigration has kept birth rates higher, is now facing reduction. A Pew Research Center report found that immigrant births fell from 102 per 1,000 women in 2007 to 87.8 per 1,000 in 2012, to bring the overall US birthrate to a mere 64 per 1,000 women—not enough to sustain current population. Europe, in short, is dying off, China and Russia, and the United States as well.
Yes, some might argue, but the over-population bomb is in the developing world, in Africa, India, Latin America…
From 1960 to 2009, Mexico’s fertility rate plunged from 7.3 live births per woman to 2.4. India’s dropped from 6 to 2.5, and Brazil’s fell from 6.15 to 1.9. Even in sub-Saharan Africa, where the average birthrate remains a relatively high 4.66, fertility is falling and is projected to fall below replacement level by the 2070s. This change in developing countries will affect not only the U.S. population, of course, but eventually the world’s.
This population implosion will soon be recognized as one of the gravest problems facing the future of life, literally, on the planet.
As the “man-made global warming” hoax goes on with the “international society to spend trillions of dollars on – redistribution of our money to the LDC dictator friends – the talk of the Illuminati and their minions about food shortage is also being exposed:
Increasing atmospheric CO2 without global warming catalyzes the growth of food.
CNS News 6 Jan. 2015 –The IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report, which was edited by then-chairman Dr. Rajendra Pachauri and released in 2007, predicted with “virtual certainty” that crop yields would plummet in some areas unless industrialized nations immediately adopted stricter limits on CO2, which the IPCC said was causing “dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” “By 2020, in some countries, yields from rain-fed agriculture could be reduced by up to 50%,” the report predicted. But last year, even a record level of atmospheric CO2 did not keep farmers from reaping record-breaking harvests worldwide, including a record opium crop in Afghanistan.
The level of atmospheric CO2 was 315.97 ppm in 1959, when it was first measured, and is now (red line left) about 40 percent higher than it was during the pre-industrial era. Note the global temp. does not increase in this century – so CO2 does not cause warming.
However, according to a report also released in November by the U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization, “world cereal production in 2014 is forecast at a new record of 2,532 million tonnes… 7 million tonnes (0.3 percent) above last year’s peak.” The study stated that the CO2 “fertilization effect is now a significant land surface process” and has created “a greening of the globe over recent decades,” says Dr. James Taylor, senior fellow for environmental policy at the Heartland Institute. “For virtually every crop that’s grown in the United States and globally, we see record crop production on just about a yearly basis. Carbon dioxide is aerial plant fertilizer.
CNSNews.com asked Taylor whether the link between high levels of CO2 and record crop yields worldwide was discussed at the UN’s climate change conference in Lima last month.
“No, it never came up,” he replied. “ Discussions claimed that global warming is wreaking havoc on crops. And that’s simply not the case.
“What you have to understand is that this is the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). These are government bodies. These are government appointees. Some of them are scientists, but many of them are not. And even those who are scientists tend to be scientists who work for environmental activist groups such as The Sierra Club, the Environmental Defense Fund, Greenpeace, World Wildlife Fund, etc. They have an agenda to push. It’s very little objective science. It’s 99 percent politics from an environmental activist agenda.