\u201cIn the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.\u201d -ADOLPH\u00a0HITLER<\/span>\u201d, 1925.<\/i><\/p>\n Hummm, even a scum of the earth dirtbag like Adolph Hitler knew how to manipulate the masses\u2026<\/p>\n So you think America actually landed men on the moon? Well, think again. We have proof that the moon landings in the late 60\u2019s and early 70\u2019s were all a big lie!<\/p>\n To start with, keep in mind that there was only about 100 people involved in the moon landing hoax. Mission Control in Houston as well as most of the men and women who worked on this project nearly 50 years ago had no idea it was a fake. But how is this possible? Very simple. The power elite who put on this fiasco never let anyone see the big picture. The thousands of people involved only had their small part to worry about. Mission control was in Houston. The launch site in Florida. The engineers, mechanics, computer programmers etc, didn\u2019t have jobs that mixed with each other. So most people couldn\u2019t figure out the whole thing amounted to a Hollywood production.<\/p>\n In, 1962, then President John Kennedy said he had a vision of America \u201cputting a man on the moon and returning him safely\u201d before the decade is out. Now, we don\u2019t know if at the time Kennedy knew this was impossible or not but shortly after his murder in 1963, the best rocket scientists in the world involved with the project informed Lyndon Johnson that science is at least 30 years away from being able to accomplish such a task. The fact is\u2026they were a little optimistic. Here we are nearly 40 years later and we still don\u2019t have the technology to send a man to the moon and return him safely to earth. The powers that decided on this fraud concluded that if they couldn\u2019t send a man to the moon and get him back safely, then what would they do is to have\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0fake the project then keep the billions of taxpayer money used to fund this operation for themselves. They then decided they actually could \u201cfake\u201d the whole thing for a fraction of the money they were being supplied. Here\u2019s a site in Iceland where we found alot of the\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0fakes were made, (BELOW).<\/p>\n Here are some facts to keep in mind about the impossibility of actually sending a human being to the moon: The moon is constantly being bombarded with \u201cmicrometeors\u201d that travel at speeds of 20,000 mph. To keep that in perspective a rifle bullet travels at 800 mph. Remember the moon has no atmosphere to slow them down. If any astronaut or the Lunar landing module got hit with just one of those\u2026…even if it were the size of a grain of rice, that would be the end. Strange\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0wasn\u2019t too concerned about this at the time, don\u2019t you think?<\/p>\n This one is incredibly funny! This is supposed to be the frogmen to rescue the Apollo men. Look at the fake \u201ckite string\u201d that is on top the the module. This is supposed to be the string that held the parachutes that brought the module to earth. I would think it would require heavy ropes for such a task. By the way, if this is same space module that brought the astronauts home then where is the area that they docked and climbed into the Lunar Module? Was it the same place? It had to be\u2026.but they also had to have the parachutes in the same place. So where are the parachutes in this photo? How was there room to get through the opening into the lunar module with the parachutes stored there? Also, look at the fake breathing respirators on their mouths so they wouldn\u2019t spread \u201cMoon germs\u201d to the frog men. Okay, what about the \u201cmoon germs\u201d that are inside the module? what about the \u201cmoon germs\u201d on their body? Are those moon germs less threatening than what they might breathe out? Maybe since\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0can\u2019t tell us how the Apollo men went to the bathroom for two weeks, We are thinking the frog men should have the gas masks on for any nasty stuff the Apollo men might have brought back! By the way, the \u201cApollo men\u201d are on the rafts and have been for at least 10 minutes, what is the \u201cfrog man\u201d still doing swimming in the ocean? Looking for the great white shark ? Or is he looking for a carp to eat tonight? Come on..AMERICA! Think about the B.S. these pictures are telling you!! (BELOW).<\/b><\/p>\n Listen to these other insane facts put out by Nasa with Buzz Aldrin in his interview with Eric Spitzagel on how they went to the bathroom:<\/p>\n Here\u2019s a completely random and perhaps insignificant detail: During our conversation, Buzz had something on his wrist that looked distinctly like a candy bracelet. I fully admit that I\u2019m probably very, very wrong, and the bracelet likely had some significance totally unrelated to candy. But whatever it was, I couldn\u2019t take my eyes off of it, and I kept waiting for Buzz to bring the bracelet to his mouth and start nibbling.<\/p>\n Eric Spitznagel: If you don\u2019t mind, I\u2019d like to ask you a question that I wrote when I was five years old.<\/p>\n Buzz Aldrin: Really? (Laughs.) You\u2019ve been waiting on this one awhile.<\/p>\n Spitznagel: My kindergarten teacher had us write letters to astronauts, asking our most burning questions about space travel. I wrote to you, but I assume you never got my letter.<\/p>\n Aldrin: Oh gosh, how long ago was that? I really couldn\u2019t tell you.<\/p>\n Spitznagel: So here\u2019s my question: How do you pee and poop in your astronaut suit?<\/p>\n Aldrin: (Laughs.) That has given me an awe for technology. You can be lying on your back in a Mercury capsule, and before technology came along, if you had to go to the bathroom, you\u2019d be lying in a pool of your own urine.<\/p>\n Spitznagel: Wasn\u2019t that the first thing you asked when you got the Moon-landing gig? \u201cHow am I gonna take a crap?\u201d<\/p>\n Aldrin: We were well skilled in the art of disposal waste. There was such a thing called a \u201cblue bag,\u201d which was kind of messy. There was a stickum on it, and you could stick it around your posterior. For urinating we had an ego-buster, which was like a condom catheter. We were cautioned not to overestimate our size. (Laughs.) Because if the condom was too big, there might be a little leakage.<\/p>\n Spitznagel: That doesn\u2019t sound very hygienic. Were you walking around the Moon with a spacesuit filled with wee?<\/p>\n Aldrin: No, no, no. There was a connection to a one-way check valve in your thigh, so you could kind of move around like this (wiggles his leg) and squeeze the urine out into a larger bag that you could then dispose of.<\/p>\n Spitznagel: Dispose of when you get back to Earth?<\/p>\n Aldrin: Or on the lunar surface.<\/p>\n Spitznagel: On the Moon? So in addition to your footprint, there\u2019s a big bag of your excrement up there?<\/p>\n Aldrin: (Laughs.) Well no, probably not anymore. Sometimes we\u2019d dispose of it during an\u00a0EVA<\/span>\u00a0(extra-vehicular activity), when we were getting rid of a bunch of extra stuff. We did that on Gemini 12. I remember we were headed local horizontal, local vertical, and we opened the hatch and I had three bags worth gripped between my legs,<\/p>\n Spitznagel: Three bags of\u2026?<\/p>\n Aldrin: Yeah, yeah. And I just tossed them like this. (Pantomimes throwing bags over his shoulders.) Straight up! Being very familiar with orbital mechanics, I should have realized what I\u2019d just done. I\u2019d put those three bags on a free return trajectory. (Laughs.) Straight back to us!<\/p>\n Spitznagel: This is starting to sound like a Farrelly Brothers comedy.<\/p>\n Aldrin: So an orbit later, we looked out the window and there were three bags in a row, heading straight for us.\u201d<\/p>\n UNBELIEVABLE<\/span>!<\/p>\n Let\u2019s look at other inconsistencies, these are supposed to be the same suits folks!!! Look at the Spacesuit (RIGHT\u00a0BELOW<\/span>),<\/p>\n This is what\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0says is the actual suit that Neil Armstrong wore on the moon. Now, Look at the same suit\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0claims was photographed with Armstrong with his individual pose. (BELOW)<\/p>\n Check out the discrepancies with the oxygen chambers and the hookup to the helmet. Now, look at the boot (BELOW\u00a0LEFT<\/span>).Look at the tread on the boot.<\/p>\n It looks nothing like the photo\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0said is the first \u201cboot print\u201d on the moon, (BELOW\u00a0RIGHT<\/span>).\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0eventually backtracked for this slip up and now claims the boots Armstrong wore on the moon were \u201cjettisoned\u201d before the\u00a0LEM<\/span>\u00a0took off from the lunar surface and weren\u2019t returned to earth\u2026….SHUUUUUUURE they were!!<\/p>\n Now, Let\u2019s take this even further. Here is Neil Armstrong on the moon, (BELOW). Is he wearing\u00a0EITHER<\/span>\u00a0of the suits\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0claimed he was earlier? If not, why was\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0having people pay to see the suit he actually wore on the moon in the earlier photo? The suit is now on display at the Neil Armstrong Museum in Ohio.<\/p>\n Another problem, other than the photographic ones<\/p>\n Is deadly radiation,not only for the astronauts but the radiation would have fried any pictures they would have tried to take. It is absurd that\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0tried to pass off these so-called pictures from the moon. We\u2019ll show you in a minute that all\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u2019S pictures are fakes.<\/p>\n The moon casts a shadow here on earth and it is 250,000 miles away. For the surface to be that bright, it would be blinding to anyone. Forget about getting pictures to come out. However none of the fake photo\u2019s the astronauts took back up this fact.<\/p>\n Neil Armstrong\u2026the alleged first man on the moon, is now suffering from a mental illness because of being forced to live with this lie all his life. Strange that we never see any astronaut that walked on the moon talk in detail about their experience in public. Why don\u2019t they?\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0will not allow them to do so. Before we show you the pictures which prove the moon landing was all a colossal hoax. We want to acknowledge photo analyst Jack White who went over thousands of photo\u2019s from\u00a0NASA<\/span>. He\u2019s an expert photographer and agrees these pictures are fake. Keep in mind each picture\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0put out has a code, like a social security number attached to it. It usually starts with the letter \u201cA\u201d and \u201cS\u201d. So, you can search\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u2019S website, punch in the code and that particular picture will come up. The pictures have all been coded for decades so no one can doctor any of the pictures with out it being easy to check against the code. For instance this picture is coded in the upper left hand corner:\u00a0AS15<\/span>-88-11901. So you know it\u2019s a real authentic picture put out by\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0and in this picture you can see the lunar rover was dropped into position by a crane. There are no tire tracks left on the front or back of the vehicle. [CLICK\u00a0ON PICTURES FOR LARGER IMAGES<\/span>]<\/p>\n Here\u2019s the same thing in photo:\u00a0AS17<\/span>-140-21354 from Apollo 17. Once again, no tracks. The rover had to have been lowered by a crane.<\/p>\n Now look at this next picture. It\u2019s a picture of astronaut Buzz Aldrin taken in Mauna Kea Hawaii. If you look at the mountains behind him, you\u2019ll see it\u2019s the same mountain\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0used in faking the picture below it that was used in the Apollo 17 mission. Just look to the right side of the picture and you\u2019ll see it\u2019s the same mountain\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0photo shopped from the one behind Buzz Aldrin in Hawaii. By the way, I wonder what all the movie production vans are doing sitting behind him?<\/p>\n And, here\u2019s the same fake mountain\u2026…..again.<\/p>\n And again! Geez, guys! c\u2019mon, you must get tired of using the same fake backdrop from Hawaii over and over again? Look at the center of the picture. You can see exactly where the movie set ends and the fake backdrop begins. Look for the same pattern on all\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0photo\u2019s.<\/p>\n Now, I don\u2019t know how\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0thought they could ever get away with this. Look at the decal on Apollo 15 that says \u201cUNITED\u00a0STATES<\/span>\u201d It\u2019s put on with nothing but scotch tape. Must be the new re-enforced scotch tape that can take those 400 degree temperatures.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s Astronaut Pete Conrad from Apollo 12. If you look in his visor, in the upper right hand corner you can see a reflection of a studio light. You can also see the \u201chotspot\u201d the studio light illuminates on the ground also reflected in his visor.<\/p>\n BELOW LEFT<\/span>: This is an absurd photo of the Eagle, the lunar module from Apollo 11 while on the moon. Look close. It is nothing but cardboard (which you can see buckling), black roofing paper, gold Reynolds wrap aluminum foil, curtain rods and masking tape along with electrical engineers tape\u2026…ridiculous!!!!!<\/p>\n Check out the \u201cMystery of the Moonrovers\u201d second from the bottom on the right: Here\u2019s a photo of Apollo 17 and the lunar rover. The picture on the top is\u00a0BEFORE<\/span>\u00a0the lunar rover was unloaded and assembled. You can see it\u2019s still packaged and has rubber bands around it. The photo at the bottom shows what it looks like\u00a0AFTER<\/span>\u00a0they broke open the package and supposedly assembled the rover. The package kind of looks like a baked potato broken open. The problem is you can see tire tracks in the photo\u00a0BEFORE<\/span>\u00a0they broke open the package and assembled the rover. [MAKE\u00a0SURE AND CLICK ON THIS LARGER IMAGE<\/span>]<\/p>\n BELOW RIGHT<\/span>: This next\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0fake comes courtesy Apollo 15. In most movie sets, the crew will take a picture of the set to try and frame it correctly before they start shooting with film. The same thing here. It\u2019s just that some absent minded photographer forgot and left the polaroids on the leg of the lunar module\u2026….dohhhh!<\/p>\n By the way, if you think the photos left on the lunar lander are just weird reflections from the gold Reynolds Wrap. (BELOW) Photo Expert Jack White shows you how you can tell the difference.<\/p>\n BELOW<\/span>: These are two photo\u2019s of the\u00a0LEM<\/span>\u00a0from Apollo 16. The top one taken from the command module on it\u2019s way to the lunar surface and the one on the bottom was taken after it landed. The problem is the top picture shows that the lunar rover was to be unloaded from the\u00a0RIGHT SIDE<\/span>\u00a0(R1) and then that just vanishes after it gets to the lunar surface and now seems to be on the\u00a0LEFT SIDE<\/span>\u00a0(S2).<\/p>\n We think the photographers for Apollo 16 need to frame their phony pictures better. You can clearly see 6 studio lights at the top of the picture at \u201cLights, Camera, Action\u201d.<\/p>\n BELOW<\/span>: Here\u2019s the lunar rover of Apollo 15 leaving no tracks again which means it was put there from above\u2026..most likely dropped into place from a crane.<\/p>\n Everyone of these pictures is of Buzz Aldrin from Apollo 11. Apparently he can\u2019t figure out how he wants to dress. In some pictures his moon suit is tucked into his moon boots, in some they are not. In some pictures his gloves are white, in some they\u2019re grey. Some pictures he has an antenna \u2026and some he doesn\u2019t. One picture shows him wearing a black arm band\u2026and it disappears in others.<\/p>\n (BELOW): These are all pictures of the lunar landing module of Apollo 11. Some on the moon, some in Lunar orbit and two just before it was put on the Saturn 5 Rocket. The last picture is just the ascent module without it\u2019s landing base attached. But\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0says these are all pictures of the same module. Do they all look the same to you?<\/p>\n Objects which are heated cannot be cooled by space. In order for an object to cool it must first be removed from direct sunlight. Objects which are in the shadow of another object will eventually cool but not because space is \u201ccold\u201d. Space is not cold. Hot and cold do not exist in the vacuum of space. Objects cool because the laws of motion dictate that the molecules of the object will slow down due to the resistance resulting from striking other molecules until eventually all motion will stop provided the object is sheltered from the direct and\/or indirect radiation of the sun and that there is no other source of heat. Since the vacuum of space is the perfect insulator objects take a very long time to cool even when removed from all sources of heat, radiated or otherwise.<\/p>\n NASA<\/span>\u00a0insists the space suits the astronauts supposedly wore on the lunar surface were air conditioned. An air conditioner cannot, and will not work without a heat exchanger. A heat exchanger simply takes heat gathered in a medium such as freon from one place and transfers it to another place. This requires a medium of molecules which can absorb and transfer the heat such as an atmosphere or water. An air conditioner will not and cannot work in a vacuum. A space suit surrounded by a vacuum cannot transfer heat from the inside of the suit to any other place. The vacuum, remember, is a perfect insulator. A man would roast in his suit in such a circumstance.<\/p>\n NASA<\/span>\u00a0claims the spacesuits were cooled by a water system which was piped around the body, then through a system of coils sheltered from the sun in the backpack.\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0claims that water was sprayed on the coils causing a coating of ice to form. The ice then supposedly absorbed the tremendous heat collected in the water and evaporated into space. There are two problems with this that cannot be explained away. 1) The amount of water needed to be carried by the astronauts in order to make this work for even a very small length of time in the direct 55 degrees over the boiling point of water (210 degrees F at sea level on Earth) heat of the sun could not have possibly been carried by the astronauts. 2)\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0has since claimed that they found ice in moon craters.\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0claims that ice sheltered from the direct rays of the sun will\u00a0NOT<\/span>\u00a0evaporate destroying their own bogus \u201cair conditioning\u201d explanation.<\/p>\n Remember this. Think about it the next time you go off in the morning with a \u201cvacuum bottle\u201d filled with hot coffee. Think about it long and hard when you sit down and pour a piping hot cup from your thermos to drink with your lunch four hours later\u2026 and then think about it again when you pour the last still very warm cup of coffee at the end of the day.<\/p>\n The same laws of physics apply to any vehicle traveling through space.\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0claims that the spacecraft was slowly rotated causing the shadowed side to be cooled by the intense cold of space\u2026 an intense cold that\u00a0DOES NOT EXIST<\/span>. In fact the only thing that could have been accomplished by a rotation of the spacecraft is a more even and constant heating such as that obtained by rotating a hot dog on a spit. In reality a dish called Astronaut a la Apollo would have been served. At the very least you would not want to open the hatch upon the crafts return.<\/p>\n NASA<\/span>\u00a0knows better than to claim, in addition, that a water cooling apparatus such as that which they claim cooled the astronauts suits cooled the spacecraft. No rocket could ever have been launched with the amount of water needed to work such a system for even a very short period of time. Fresh water weighs a little over 62 lbs. per cubic foot. Space and weight capacity were critical given the lift capability of the rockets used in the Apollo Space Program. No such extra water was carried by any mission whatsoever for suits or for cooling the spacecraft.<\/p>\n On the tapes the Astronauts complained bitterly of the cold during their journey and while on the surface of the moon. They spoke of using heaters that did not give off enough heat to overcome the intense cold of space. It was imperative that\u00a0NASA<\/span>\u00a0use this ruse because to tell the truth would\u00a0TELL THE TRUTH<\/span>. It is also proof of the arrogance and contempt in which the Illuminati holds the common man.<\/p>\n What we heard is in reality indicative of an over zealous cooling system in the props used during the filming of the missions at the Atomic Energy Commissions Nevada desert test site, where it is common to see temperatures well over 100 degrees. In the glaring unfiltered direct heat of the sun the Astronauts could never have been cold at any time whatsoever in the perfect insulating vacuum of space.<\/p>\n It would also be a good idea for you to measure the dimensions of the astronauts in their spacesuits and then measure the actual usable dimensions of the hatch that they had to use to egress and ingress the Lander. Also measure the inside dimensions of the actual Lander and you will see that the astronauts (liars) could not have possibly left or entered in their suits through that hatch. Notice the position of the hinge of the hatch and then examine the Lunar Lander training simulator and measure all the dimensions noted above taking care to note the position of the hinge on the much larger hatch and you may become \u201cillumined\u201d… so to speak.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/bp3.blogger.com\/_7Bqr1I5gzyk\/R53n0bk7fdI\/AAAAAAAAARE\/lnTmC4M-FXc\/s1600-h\/moonpan_apollo17_big.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n