{"id":12072,"date":"2020-05-12T15:28:44","date_gmt":"2020-05-12T03:28:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/?p=12072"},"modified":"2023-08-22T10:09:49","modified_gmt":"2023-08-21T22:09:49","slug":"no-nukes-were-dropped-on-hiroshima-and-nagasaki","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/conspiracies\/no-nukes-were-dropped-on-hiroshima-and-nagasaki\/","title":{"rendered":"No Nukes Were Dropped on Hiroshima and\u00a0Nagasaki"},"content":{"rendered":"

The “Nuclear Bomb” story is all just another psyop<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n
\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cIn Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan. There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter.<\/em><\/p>\n

It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima\u2019s clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright. It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.<\/em><\/p>\n

I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects. At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the \u201cbald spot\u201d where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn\u2019t there or anywhere else.<\/em><\/p>\n

I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.<\/em><\/p>\n

What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs \u2013 the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava \u2013 just as in other Japanese cities. The concrete buildings nearest to the center of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage.<\/em><\/p>\n

Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.\u201d \u00a0\u00a0 – Major Alexander Seversky<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"
\nAerial view of central Hiroshima before fire bombing<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

If we go back to the pre-Hiroshima nuke propaganda, we find talk of areas being burned into a glass parking lot where no life would be able to grow for the next 500 years. This obviously did not happen! Here are a few photos comparing the aftermath of a firebombing of Tokyo and the aftermath of the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima. Are they very different other than that of the larger Tokyo having more surviving buildings? Is it possible that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen as targets for this deception instead of a more strategic target like Tokyo because they were mainly filled with cheap light paper-thin wooden structures, thereby making the devastation of the firestorm appear more complete?<\/p>\n

It appears another massive lie has been propagated and propagandized into our minds through the mass education\/indoctrination system.<\/p>\n

Much evidence suggesting that the United States never dropped nuke bombs, (one uranium, one plutonium) is emerging. Watch this short clip from a 1945 newsreel and you cannot see any difference between the U.S. fire carpet bombing 62 cities directly before Hiroshima and Nagasaki.<\/p>\n

****<\/p>\n

No Remaining Radiation in Nuked Cities. Why?<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Burchett\u2019s reference to the atomic plague immediately moved the War Department into action. At first they ordered Burchett to leave Japan. Then the camera he had used in Hiroshima mysteriously disappeared. The US occupation authorities claimed that Burchett had been taken in by Japanese propaganda about radiation.<\/p>\n

They decided to let him stay in Japan and opted instead to deal with his charges about atomic sickness by simply denying that radiation had caused any problems. As a result, a New York Times reporter who had a week earlier reported witnessing sickness and death due to the lingering effects of the atomic bomb simply reversed the truth.<\/p>\n

He now reported that according to the head of the US atomic mission to Japan the bomb had not produced any \u201cdangerous, lingering radioactivity.\u201d\u00a0 The Washington Post uncritically noted that the atomic mission staff had been unable to find any Japanese person suffering from radiation sickness.\u00a0\u00a0(Source)<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Now the fact that both cities are flourishing with no evidence of prolonged rates of cancer or radioactivity, which should be increasing yearly due to the nuke bombing 75 years ago.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor all other cancers, incidence increase did not appear until around ten years after the attacks. The increase was first noted in 1956 and soon after tumor registries were started in both Hiroshima and Nagasaki to collect data on the excess cancer risks caused by the radiation exposure.<\/span><\/p>\n

The most thorough study regarding the incidence of solid cancer (meaning cancer that is not leukemia) was conducted by a team led by Dale L. Preston of Hirosoft International Corporation and published in 2003.<\/p>\n

The study estimated the attributable rate of radiation exposure to solid cancer to be significantly lower than that for leukemia\u201410.7%.<\/p>\n

According to the RERF, the data corroborates the general rule that even if someone is exposed to a barely survivable whole-body radiation dose, the solid cancer risk will not be more than five times greater than the risk of an unexposed individual.<\/p>\n

One of the most immediate concerns after the attacks regarding the future of both Hiroshima and Nagasaki was what health effects the radiation would have on the children of survivors conceived after the bombings.<\/p>\n

So far, no radiation-related excess of disease has been seen in the children of survivors, though more time is needed to be able to know for certain.<\/p>\n

In general, though, the healthfulness of the new generations in Hiroshima and Nagasaki provide confidence that, like the oleander flower, the cities will continue to rise from their past destruction.<\/p>\n

Perhaps most reassuring of this is the view of the cityscapes themselves. Among some there is the unfounded fear that Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still radioactive; in reality, this is not true.\u201d<\/p>\n

****\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

To drive home the point that radiation was not a problem, General Groves invited thirty reporters out to the New Mexico site where the bomb had first been tested two months earlier.<\/p>\n

This effort paid off with a banner headline in the New York Times: \u201cU.S. Atom Bomb Site Belies Tokyo Tales; Tests on New Mexico Range Confirm That Blast, and Not Radiation, Took Toll,\u201d\u00a0[23]<\/a><\/p>\n

Life magazine concluded after the escorted tour in New Mexico that no Japanese person could have died as a result of lingering radiation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Radiation Should Continue to be Increasing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but it\u2019s NOT!<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cThe atomic bomb that detonated over Hiroshima used Uranium-235, while the Nagasaki bomb had Plutonium-239. The half-life of U-235 is 700 million years, while that of Pu-239 is 24,000 years.<\/p>\n

In other words, once on the ground, they will be there for a very long time. I thus again visited both peace parks to get to the bottom of all this.<\/p>\n

I asked for and received several pages from the Hiroshima Peace Museum regarding this issue. To quote:<\/p>\n

\u201cToday, the background radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki is the same as the average amount of natural radiation present anywhere on Earth. It is not enough to affect human health.\u201d<\/p>\n

Part of the answer is that these bombs exploded high up in the air and all the radioactive material blew or rained away\u2026 somewhere. I guess.<\/p>\n

But, Little Boy over Hiroshima was only about 1% efficient, so what happened to the 139 pounds of the U-235 that were particularized? From all reports, the plume dissipated over land and sea. Same for Nagasaki and the 12 pounds of Pu-239 particles.<\/p>\n

There was a slight increase of leukemia in the Nagasaki region, but no additional incidence of cancers anywhere in and around Hiroshima.<\/p>\n

Thus, contrary to any kind of logical sense, while the high altitude (1968 feet for Hiroshima and 1800 feet for Nagasaki) of the nuclear explosions immediately killed 200,000 people, these cities soon became safe, and are thriving today.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m still wondering why.<\/p>\n

*****<\/p>\n

The reasons most of these and many more pictures by LIFE photographers on the ground in both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were never published have largely been lost or simply forgotten over the intervening seven decades.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

First Reports of Nuke Bombing Reported<\/a><\/p>\n

The first photograph of Japanese victims appeared in Life magazine about two months after the end of the war.\u00a0[15]<\/a>\u00a0But the magazine used a caption to undercut the power of the photos. The caption stated that the photographer\u00a0\u201creported that [the] injuries looked like those he had seen when he photographed men burned at Pearl Harbor<\/strong>.\u201d\u00a0[16]<\/a>\u00a0For the most part, photographs of the human cost of the atomic bombings seldom appeared in the American media until the 1950s,\u00a0[17]<\/a>\u00a0by which time they would have had little influence on nuclear policy, which had fully absorbed nuclear arms and power into American military planning and civilian life.<\/p>\n

****<\/p>\n

\"Smoke<\/p>\n

Said to be Atomic blast of Nagasaki yet clearly shows two separate bomb clouds<\/p>\n

Of course, one of them must be fake. Or perhaps \u2013 uh\u2026- could both be?\u00a0\":blink:\"\u00a0To those unfamiliar with photo-analyses: Note that the background in the pictures has evidently moved \u2013 meaning the 2 shots (if real) must have been snapped at different moments in time(as the airplane moved along). Now, look at the mushroom cloud in the foreground: It is identical in shape. Enough said? Or are you willing to believe that the mushroom cloud\u2019s shape remained static between the two shots? Or that the two shots were captured by two photographers \u2013 at the exact same moment in time?<\/p>\n

****<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

More Hype and Propaganda from Life Magazine<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the following waves [after the initial blast] people\u2019s bodies were terribly squeezed, then their internal organs ruptured.\u00a0Then the blast blew the broken bodies at 500 to 1,000 miles per hour through the flaming, rubble-filled air.<\/strong>\u00a0Practically everybody within a radius of 6,500 feet was killed or seriously injured and all buildings crushed or disemboweled.\u201d\u00a0<\/em>\u2014 From the article \u201cAtom Bomb Effects,\u201d LIFE magazine, 3\/11\/1946<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cIn Hiroshima, 30 days after the first atomic bomb destroyed the city and shook the world, people are still dying, mysteriously and horribly\u2014people who were uninjured in the cataclysm\u2014from an unknown something which I can only describe as the atomic plague.<\/p>\n

The A<\/b>tomic\u00a0Bomb<\/b>\u00a0hoax 1945-2015<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Today\u00a025460\u00a0days have passed since the first media fake propaganda about the Hiroshima atomic bomb was published by the USA during WW2.<\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Summary<\/b>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
1.\u00a0Hiroshima<\/i><\/b>\u00a0and\u00a0<\/i>Nagasaki<\/i><\/b>\u00a0were not destroyed by atomic bombs\u00a0<\/i>1945<\/i><\/b>. The Japanese towns with their poor inhabitants in their simple wood\/paper shanty houses were destroyed and burnt down by US\u00a0<\/i>napalm<\/i><\/b><\/a>carpet bombings<\/i><\/b>. The rich Japanese lived in the suburbs!<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/b>\u00a0That two atomic bombs exploded in Japan\u00a0<\/i>1945<\/i><\/b>were just\u00a0<\/i>US wartime propaganda<\/i><\/b><\/a>(false information) to impress the Soviet union. Stalin wasn\u2019t fooled. He (or his deputy Beria) invented\/faked his own atomic bomb\u00a0<\/i>1949<\/i><\/b>.<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/b>. The almost 70 years old hoax from\u00a0<\/i>6 August 1945<\/i><\/b>is of course still working kept going strong by several governments, crazy generals and plenty physicists incl. Nobel prize winners that cannot get any better jobs than lying for their governments \u2013 the only real job many physicists can get apart from being low paid school teachers \u2013 and by mainstream media that are experts in publishing false info to brainwash you.<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/b>. The USA use billions of dollars to maintain the hoax. Russia doesn\u2019t spend a rubel or kopek to keep the show going.<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.\u00a0<\/b>France faked its atomic bomb in the 1960\u2019s.<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
6<\/b>. 10 000\u2019s of atomic bombs have since 1946 been built, transported around, mishandled, dropped by mistake by incompetent soldiers but none has ever exploded.<\/i>\u00a0Reason is that an atomic bomb cannot explode.\u00a0<\/i><\/b>It is physically impossible as shown in this article.<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7.\u00a0<\/b>A thermonuclear war is therefore not possible!<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/b>. Nuclear arms are very safe and secure! They cannot harm anything. But<\/i>\u00a0it is illegal to say so!<\/i><\/b><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/b>. The\u00a0<\/i>Islamic Republic of Iran<\/i><\/b>\u00a0is trying since 30 years to fake an atomic bomb that Stalin did in four years 65 years ago assisted by Gulag prisoners and\u00a0<\/i>Wismut AG\u00a0<\/i><\/b>of<\/i>\u00a0Aue, Saxony<\/i><\/b>.<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/b>. The International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, and its boss Yukiya Amano and the dictator of North Korea are part of the hoax. Just ask them about it. They are paid to lie about atomic bombs. Just laugh at them and refer them to this web site.<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/i><\/b>. The good news are that atomic bombs or A-bombs do not work and are nothing to be afraid of.<\/i><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

After a while the crazy but law abiding physicists got serious and believed their own lies and started to teach them as truths at universities. Internal criticism was no longer possible. You had to believe\u00a0or<\/i>\u00a0you were not part of the gang(sters).\u00a0It is against the law to tell otherwise!<\/b><\/p>\n

The\u00a0US Atomic Energy Act of 1946<\/b><\/a>\u00a0(and its revisions) charges the US\u00a0Atomic Energy Commission<\/b>(AEC), and later the US\u00a0Department of Energy<\/b>\u00a0(DoE), with regulating\u00a0restricted data<\/i>\u00a0wherever it appears and wherever it comes from, i.e.\u00a0control of information<\/i>. In plain language \u2013 censorship!<\/p>\n

The\u00a0restricted data<\/i>\u00a0clause of the US\u00a0Atomic Energy Act<\/b>\u00a0specifies that\u00a0all<\/i>\u00a0nuclear weapons-related information is to be considered\u00a0classified<\/i>\u00a0unless explicitly declassified, and makes no distinction about whether said information was created in a laboratory by a government scientist or\u00a0anywhere else in the world by private citizens\u00a0<\/i>(sic).<\/p>\n

Thus nuclear weapons information is\u00a0born secret<\/i>\u00a0according to the US law<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The US authorities don\u2019t have any choice in the matter\u00a02015<\/b>. Therefore all information that a-bombs are fake are effectively censored in the USA. It seems this web page has been overlooked by DoE \u2026 and that I am in breach with the law. And you the readers are also at risk! You are reading\u00a0classified<\/i>information.<\/p>\n

It must be kept secret!<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n

The hoax works today 70 years later by keeping plenty silly, unintelligent, opportunistic people occupied. It is a criminal threat. And now terrorists may use them! What a crazy world.<\/p>\n

****<\/p>\n

\"131230_HIST_Life-Hiroshima\"<\/p>\n

Go Team USA! We Kill \u2019em Better Than Anyone Else! Yea!<\/p>\n

Killing poor, unarmed\u00a0civilians<\/i>\u00a0were common practice during WW2 by\u00a0terrorists<\/i>\u00a0on both sides but the allies were in the lead. A typical US bomber run on a civilian, non-military Japanese town, and there were many, would be made at night, at low altitude and deliver a mixture of high explosive and incendiary bombs. The objective was to turn the closely-packed, wooden homes and buildings prevalent in Japanese cities into raging infernos and ultimately into the most destructive of all weapons \u2013 the\u00a0fire storm<\/b>. Tokyo on the night of March 9-10, 1945 is a typical example.<\/p>\n

B-29s was unleashed \u2013 each plane stripped of ammunition for its machine guns to allow it to carry more\u00a0fire bombs<\/b>. The lead attackers arrived over the city just after dark and were followed by a procession of death that lasted until dawn. The fires started by the initial raiders could be seen from 150 miles away. The results were devastating: almost 17 square miles of the city were reduced to ashes. Estimates of the number of defenceless civilians, mostly elderly, women and children killed range between 80 000 and 200 000. The young men were evidently not at home but served in the armed forces. The industry was located far away.\u00a0The\u00a0military<\/i>\u00a0value of the fire bombing raids was zero<\/b>.<\/p>\n

****<\/p>\n

Good Source of More Info<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.big-lies.org\/NUKE-LIES\/www.nukelies.com\/forum\/index.html<\/a><\/p>\n

****<\/p>\n

Galen Winsor is a nuclear physicist of renown who worked at, and helped design, nuclear power plants in Hanford, WA; Oak Ridge, TN; Morris, IL, San Jose, CA; Wimington, NJ. Among his positions of expertise he was in charge of measuring and controlling the nuclear fuel inventory and storage.<\/p>\n

He completely blows the lid off the idea of \u201cnuclear meltdown\u201d or \u201cnuclear waste,\u201d it simply does not exist, he even eats a good portion of live radioactive waste on video and claims to have been doing it for years! In this excellent presentation Galen shows that fear of nuclear radiation has been greatly exaggerated to scare people and so a few powerful organizations can maintain total control of the world\u2019s most valuable power resource:<\/p>\n

] Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events have been given an almost surreal significance; we have collected together threads on the topic, which completely debunk the official lies. Click here\u00a0for our forum on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the US bombing<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n

Issues include in no particular order:
\n\u2022 First report by John Hersey, in a special edition of the New Yorker. His piece on\u00a0Hiroshima<\/i>\u00a0filled the entire issue \u2013 and was published in 1946, many months later than the bombing. Here it is \u2013\u00a01946 Hersey piece, and comments<\/a>
\n\u2022 The antennae on the supposed bombs:\u00a0The antennae on the claimed bombs would not have worked<\/a>
\n\u2022 The Norden bombsight error radius: as supposedly used by Ferebee, had an error radius bigger than the entire town\u00a0The Norden bombsight as supposedly used by Ferebee in the Enola Gay, had an error radius bigger than the entire town<\/a>
\n\u2022 Tibbets\u2019 accounts are contradictory \u2013 see the section on the Enola Gay, the bombing plane that supposedly bombed Hiroshima. Click here for detailed analysis of newsreel and propaganda footage at the time:\u00a0Enola Gay plane, crew, Tinian, testimony and evidence<\/a>
\n\u2022 The airplane supposedly sent specifically to collect data, didn\u2019t
\n\u2022 We note the\u00a0small number of photos of the supposedly hugely significant \u2018mushroom cloud\u2019 from the ground in Japan<\/a>, and anomalies in the very few photos. The Japanese were technologically advanced; where are the photographs and films?
\n\u2022 Generally, note how few photos there are, and how unconvincing they are\u00a0even the \u2018declassified\u2019 ones \u2013 the photographs and films, and even drawings, are unconvincing.<\/a>
\n\u2022 Watch for eye-witness giveaways \u2013 e.g. an extract from Osada\u2019s book \u2018Children of the A bomb\u2019 which shows the town was firebombed\u00a0e.g. an extract from Osada\u2019s book \u2018Children of the A bomb\u2019<\/a>
\n\u2022 Jungk\u2019s post-war \u2018Brighter than a Thousand Suns\u2019 was a big seller. We look at problems in 1950s historical accounts:\u00a0Robert Jungk\u2019s 1956 (German) and 1958 (English translation) book \u2018Brighter than a Thousand Suns\u2019<\/a>
\n\u2022 Fake testimony \u2013 Claud Eatherly is an example\u00a0Eatherley\u2019s book (with a foreword by \u2018Gunther Anders\u2019 who was also associated with the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation)<\/a>
\n\u2022 Fairly new information on the Japanese surrender, and dealing with Stalin and ending the war \u2013 this is a short Youtube Video talk by David Irving on Hiroshima\u2019s purpose and timing\u00a0http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Cfunvkn4jBM<\/a>
\n\u2022 Management of radiation scare stories has been ridiculously erratic:
\n. . . \u2022 \u201cHiroshima Study finds NO GENETIC DAMAGE\u201d\u00a0Years after \u2013 no genetic problems found in Japan!<\/a>
\n. . . \u2022 \u201cHiroshima \u2013 Was there radiation, or wasn\u2019t there?\u201d \u2013\u00a0One or other must be a lie!<\/a>
\n. . . \u2022 (The same confusion applies with Fukushima\u2026)\u00a0Japan\u2019s Prime Minister says it was \u201ca very grave crisis\u201d; but was it?<\/a>
\n. . . \u2022 Getting rid of witnesses?\u00a0Story of the USS\u00a0Indianapolis<\/i>, sunk in 1945 on the way back from supposedly shipping two atom bombs;<\/a>\u00a0the sailors were left for days (mentioned in the film \u2018Jaws\u2019. Note: not to be confused with the\u00a0Annapolis<\/i>\u00a0ships and seaport). Few survived, but only by chance.
\n\u2022 Watch for oddities in all official stories. I\u2019m told B H Liddell Hart\u2019s\u00a0History of the Second World War<\/i>remarks that no Japanese knew they\u2019d been atom bombed until long after the end of the war. In our interpretation, of course, this is a restatement of the fact that US propaganda was responsible for the hoax.
\n\u2022 Here we look at the process of making up properties such a bomb should presumably have, and inconsistencies \u2013 flash, blast, heat generated, radiation, \u2018mushroom cloud\u2019, and the general lack of nuclear phenomena\u00a0Inventing A bomb properties<\/a>
\n\u2022 Media switch to friendship with Japan after the War\u00a0Herman Kahn and Japan & Post-War Switch to Friendship, possibly in exchange for no staged Japanese war crimes tribunal<\/a><\/p>\n

No Nukes Were Dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n