{"id":27821,"date":"2022-11-03T17:36:12","date_gmt":"2022-11-03T04:36:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/?p=27821"},"modified":"2023-08-14T19:56:07","modified_gmt":"2023-08-14T07:56:07","slug":"stephen-hawking-died-and-was-replaced","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/conspiracies\/stephen-hawking-died-and-was-replaced\/","title":{"rendered":"STEPHEN HAWKING DIED AND WAS REPLACED"},"content":{"rendered":"

Miles Mathis has written hundreds of essays, including some of the best researched content I have ever found online. It is all on his website http:\/\/mileswmathis.com<\/a> so why on earth would I be re-posting any of his content? (And no, I haven’t asked him for permission) – Simply because his way of posting everything as PDF’s is a right pain in the arse, and sometimes I would like to just be able to link to a webpage with his essay on it. And also, his website is a bit of a mess in my humble opinion, all mixed up posts with a urine yellow background colour and kitten pictures and no indexing. Back in 2001 when I was designing websites I would have had a fit!<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Stephen Hawking died and has been replaced – by Miles Mathis <\/strong>(First published April 17, 2015)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

I have written several papers critiquing Stephen Hawking, including a long one on his Brave New
\nWorld series for the BBC. But this is my first paper really linking my science research with my faked
\nevents research. I will use simple photo analysis and facial analysis to quickly show you the current
\nStephen Hawking is not the same person as the original Stephen Hawking.<\/p>\n

This should not surprise you too much, especially if you know something about ALS. ALS is
\nAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease. We are told Hawking has had
\nALS for over 52 years, which is a record by many decades. Jason Becker is the only person I have
\nheard of who has lived more than 20 years with the disease, so there is about a three-decade difference
\nbetween the longest survivor and the second longest survivor. That is a more than 100% difference
\nbetween first and second place. It would be like Justin Gatlin running the 100 meters in 9.8 seconds,
\nand Usain Bolt beating him with a time of 4.5 seconds. In other words, statistically it doesn’t happen.
\nThe average survival time for ALS is four years. When Hawking was first diagnosed in 1963, doctors
\ngave him two years to live. And yet here we are, 52 years later and counting. Should you believe it?
\nWell, no. Like Becker, it appears the real Hawking did beat the odds and live for about 20 years. But
\nat some point he was replaced. I have no proof he died, but I assume that is why they replaced him.<\/p>\n

He was a very useful public relations entity for physics, and they didn’t want to lose him.
\nBut rather than speculate on that, let us go right to the evidence. I won’t call it proof, since of course
\nyou are free to disagree with me. This is an opinion piece, not a court transcript; and even if it were a
\nstamped court finding, you would be free to disagree with it. You don’t have to agree with anything
\nanyone tells you, ever. Remember that. This paper is nothing more than presented evidence, evidence
\nI find compelling. If you also find it compelling, fine. If you don’t, also fine.<\/p>\n

The picture under title is the real Hawking. Notice the longish face and skinny neck. Also notice the
\ndark brown hair. Here is another picture of the real Hawking:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Let that etch into your brain. This is also Hawking, a few years later:<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nYou see that his hair is turning gray. But the thing to notice here is his teeth. Pretty awful, right?
\nWell, it gets worse.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

He is now fully gray, and he has pretty much lost his lower teeth. I am not a dentist and don’t know
\nexactly what is going on there, but it looks like those teeth have been filed down or chipped down, with
\nonly stub fillings left. The next step would be dentures, right?<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nWell, no. The next step, apparently, was going from gray to blonde, even in the eyebrows, and a whole
\nnew set of old yellow teeth. He also bought some new fat cheeks. Amazing right?<\/p>\n

Actually, that is the replacement. That isn’t Hawking, as I hope you can see now that I point it out. Go
\nback two photos and compare the teeth directly. Not even close. They found a guy with the same nose
\nand big ears, but otherwise they don’t look that much alike. This is the guy you have been looking at
\nfor the past thirty years. Which means Hawking might not have written A Brief History of Time, which
\ncame out in 1988. I haven’t pinpointed the date, but that was about the time they made the switch. My
\ncurrent guess is early 80’s, which\u2014if true\u2014would mean that book was a forgery.<\/p>\n

You will say, \u201cThat is just a younger Hawking, before he lost those lower teeth.\u201d No, it isn’t. I just
\nshowed you the younger Hawking, and he didn’t look like that. Compare them side by side.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Besides, the first picture is Hawking from the 1970’s. The second is Hawking from the 1990’s.
\nAmazing that he aged 20 years with a debilitating disease and got younger looking at the same time,
\nisn’t it?<\/p>\n

Hawking was still looking young in 2007, when he went aboard the ZeroG Plane:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

See how it says \u201czero g\u201d on his shirt? That is from when he went up in the plane, which was in 2007.
\nHe was supposed to be 65 in 2007. Looks great for 65, eh? Unfortunately, he already looked older
\nthan that in 1982, 25 years earlier:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

1982 vs 2007<\/em><\/p>\n

His face also got shorter. Normally your face will get longer as you age, not shorter.
\nHere is a more recent photo of the impostor:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Again, the teeth are the clue. This may be the same guy as our blonde impostor, but it certainly isn’t
\nStephen Hawking. Go back to the earlier photos. Those four lower teeth were supposed to be gone
\ndecades ago, filed down to filling nubs. Are we supposed to believe they regrew? Do those look like
\ncaps or dentures to you? Would you pay a dentist to replace your teeth with those? No, we are
\nsupposed to believe that is what he has left of his real teeth, obviously. But I have just shown you why
\nthat cannot be the case.<\/p>\n

Here is a photo I found of the blonde impostor where is it really easy to see he isn’t Hawking:<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nThat picture is from a foreign magazine, I guess, since it seems to have been suppressed in the US and
\non the internet. I only found one copy of it, and the full-size image is gone. The website has been
\nscrubbed. This makes me think photos of this guy have normally been retouched to make him look a
\nbit more like Hawking.<\/p>\n

And here is a really weird one, although I bet you won’t see it until I point it out:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Well, did you find the problem? This time it is with the hands. Look at the coloration and texture.
\nThose are waxwork hands. If you can’t see it there, maybe you can see it here:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Another reason I noticed the hands is that they don’t look like ALS hands. In Hawking’s biography,
\nthey admit that his fingers had already begun to curl in the 1960’s. Those with this disease not only
\ncan’t straighten their fingers, they can’t straighten their wrists. In older pictures of Hawking, he has
\nbadly curled wrists, with his left hand normally bent sideways. So how did his hands suddenly get so
\nsmooth and relaxed in his 70’s?<\/p>\n

Many of the photos of Hawking have been faked, as you might expect given what we just discovered.
\nTake a look at these two, for instance:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Those are both sold to us as wedding pictures of Hawking and Elaine Mason. So how many times did
\nthey get married, and how many wedding dresses did Mason have? I knew these were faked even
\nbefore noticing the two wedding dresses, because this is the real Hawking, not the blonde impostor.
\nBut Mason married the blonde impostor, so I knew these photos must be faked. How did I know this
\nwas Hawking so fast? Look at the photo of him from the side. See how skinny his neck is and how it
\nslopes up quickly to meet his skull? Then he has a protruding rear skull. The blonde impostor doesn’t
\nhave that. The shape of his skull is entirely different, and it is very obvious from the side. The real
\nHawking was always much more bony and angular.<\/p>\n

I also beg you to notice again how old Hawking looks there. That was supposed to be 1995 (but was
\nreally 1984-ish). Then how did he look like this in 2007?<\/p>\n

\"\"
\ndated 1995 but actually ~1984 \/ 2007<\/em><\/p>\n

Twelve (actually 23) years later with a debilitating disease, and he looks ten years younger? How does
\nthat work? Where did he get those cheeks?<\/p>\n

If this analysis is true, it would mean that Hawking’s recent books are forgeries, unless he wrote them
\nfrom beyond the grave (or is still alive as a brain in a tank somewhere). And it would mean his
\nrecommendation in 2012 that Peter Higgs get the Nobel Prize was a forgery. The only person
\nrecommending anything in that case would be this impostor.<\/p>\n

You may say something like, \u201cYes, I see what you are saying, but I am going to withhold judgment
\nuntil this breaks in the press. If you are right, it can’t stay hidden. Someone will sue or something and
\na judge will decide.\u201d To this I say, don’t hold your breath. These things do stay out of the mainstream
\npress indefinitely, since the press is controlled. For example, the truth about the Lincoln assassination
\nstill hasn’t come out in the mainstream, 150 years later. Odds are, no one will ever decide this for you,
\nso you have to do your own research. If you doubt my analysis, do your own. This is how things now
\nwork, and if you want to know something, you have to research it and make your own decision. Which
\nis why I don’t mind putting this on my science site. That is what science is, after all. Not accepting
\nsomeone else’s decision\u2014which would be belief by hearsay or reputation. Science is studying the facts
\nyourself and coming to your own conclusions. You cannot do science second hand. You can learn
\nfrom a teacher, but ultimately you have to be your own scientist.<\/p>\n

But let’s not quit there. I would really like to know if Hawking’s famous book is a forgery. I have
\nproposed before that the sales numbers for that book were faked, since they aren’t believable. But if we
\ncan show that Hawking was already gone before the book came out, that would go a long way to
\nproving the sales figures were also faked. If they can fake the author they are hardly going to stick at
\nfaking the sales numbers, are they?<\/p>\n

Since most of the photos of Hawking on the internet are conveniently not dated, this line of research is
\ndifficult. So let’s go to his biography to see if we can find other clues to the date of the switch. We find
\nthe important paragraph at Wikipedia without much effort:<\/p>\n

During a visit to the European Organisation for Nuclear Research on the border of France and Switzerland
\nin mid-1985, Hawking contracted pneumonia, which in his condition was life-threatening; he was so ill that
\nJane was asked if life support should be terminated. She refused but the consequence was a tracheotomy,
\nwhich would require round-the-clock nursing care, and remove what remained of his speech. [55] [56] The
\nNational Health Service would pay for a nursing home, but Jane was determined that he would live at
\nhome. The cost of the care was funded by an American foundation. [57] [58] Nurses were hired for the
\nthree shifts required to provide the round-the-clock support he required. One of those employed was Elaine
\nMason, who was to become Hawking’s second wife.<\/p>\n

Wow. It’s all there, we only have to unwind it. First of all, if you have had ALS for 23 years and have
\npneumonia to the point that doctors are recommending life support be terminated, a tracheotomy isn’t
\ngoing to cure you immediately. A tracheotomy is just the procedure of drilling a hole in your windpipe
\nso you can breath through it instead of your nose or mouth. But the problems obviously went far
\nbeyond that, or they wouldn’t have been recommending life support termination. He was probably
\nlosing control of his diaphragm, and couldn’t fill his lungs on his own. That is what happens with ALS,
\nyou know: you lose control of parts of your body one by one, until you finally lose control of them all.
\nWe aren’t told why a tracheotomy suddenly allowed him to go off the ventilator, for instance. So none
\nof this makes any sense. If you have any doctor friends, ask them what they think of this paragraph at
\nWikipedia. They may tell you the truth.<\/p>\n

This makes the likely date of the switch 1985, which is three years before A Brief History of Time came
\nout. And it looks like Elaine Mason married the blonde impostor, not Hawking. Which brings us to
\nthe next clue:<\/p>\n

By December 1977, [Hawking’s first wife] Jane had met organist Jonathan Hellyer Jones when singing in a
\nchurch choir. Hellyer Jones became close to the Hawking family, and by the mid-1980s, he and Jane had
\ndeveloped romantic feelings for each other.<\/p>\n

\u201cBy the mid-1980’s.\u201d That confirms the date of 1985 as the date of the switch. If Hawking died in
\n1985, Jane would of course be free to move on to Jones. This would also absolve her of any taint of
\nadultery, so my reading is actually less sordid (and more believable) than the mainstream reading. It
\nexplains all the partner switches in the 1980’s.<\/p>\n

To continue to pursue this line of reasoning, let us look at a clue hidden (probably on purpose) here.
\nThe cost of his care was funded by an American foundation. That probably didn’t jump out at you,
\nsince it is written in a language to make it disappear for most people. But that very language acted as a
\nred flag for me. So what American foundation funded this? It took some digging, but it is the
\nMacArthur Foundation. This is a huge red flag, since John D. MacArthur was the owner of Bankers
\nLife and Casualty, one of the largest insurance firms. At the time of his death he was said to have been
\none of the three richest men in the US. So we should look at his foundation like we look at the
\nRockefeller Foundation or the Ford Foundation: that is to say, with high suspicion.<\/p>\n

MacArthur owned Bankers Life from 1935 to 1978. In that year, most of his wealth went into his
\nFoundation, we are told. Curiously, in the next year, 1979, a large financial services holding company
\ncalled Conseco (now CNO) was born. It immediately began buying up insurance companies, including
\nBankers Life and Casualty. Get ready for this: it bought Bankers Life in 1986, the very same year the
\nMacArthur Foundation began funding Hawking. Coincidence? We’ll see.<\/p>\n

We are told CNO purchased Bankers Life for 118 million, which seems absurdly low for the company
\nof the 3rd richest man in the US. How did MacArthur become a multi-billionaire from such a measly
\ncompany? These are the questions you should be asking.<\/p>\n

Forbes listed CNO with a revenue of 4.5 billion in 2007. This despite the fact that CNO had gone
\nthrough the third largest bankruptcy (after Enron and Worldcom) in US history in 2002. Also despite
\nthe fact that CNO is listed with only four subsidiaries, including Bankers Life, Colonial Penn,
\nWashington National, and 40\/86. Something doesn’t add up here.<\/p>\n

Neither does MacArthur’s Wikipedia page, which is ridiculously short for someone who was recently
\nthe 3rd richest man in the US. In fact, if you Google John MacArthur without the middle initial, it takes
\nyou to first to John F. MacArthur, a radio pastor. Yes, I am sure he is more important to US history
\nthan the 3rd richest man in the US, with a Foundation endowed in the amount of 6 billion.<\/p>\n

But back to MacArthur’s Wikipedia page. It says he was born a poor black child in rural Mississippi.
\nJust kidding, that is a line from Steve Martin’s The Jerk. But seriously, his official bio says he and his
\nsiblings grew up in poverty, the children of an itinerant Baptist preacher. That is a bit hard to believe,
\nconsidering that all his surviving brothers also became rich and\/or famous. They admit that of his older
\nbrother Charles MacArthur, the famous playwright who was part of the Algonquin Round Table, dated
\nDorothy Parker, and married Helen Hayes. But they forget to tell you of Alfred, who also made a mint
\nin insurance; and Lawrence Telfer MacArthur, who was a publisher. So all four brothers just happened
\nto scratch their way out of crushing poverty into wealth and fame? Sure they did. Because America is
\njust that kind of place.<\/p>\n

A clue may be found by looking at Catherine T. MacArthur’s family. Her family name was Hyland, and
\nwe are told her father was part of the Irish Catholic political machine in South Chicago, holding several
\nlocal and state positions. That should be another red flag, and may be a clue as to how the MacArthurs
\nadvanced. Chicago politics has long been famous for its corruption, and even Wikipedia says,
\nThe political environment in Chicago in the 1910s and 1920s let organized crime flourish to the point that
\nmany Chicago policemen earned more money from pay-offs than from the city.<\/p>\n

This is when Catherine MacArthur’s father would have been rising in Chicago politics.
\nWe see similar fed flags when we return to John D. MacArthur’s page. In addition to his insurance
\ncompanies, he was also known as a Palm Beach, FL, real estate mogul, buying up large parts of Palm
\nBeach and Sarasota in the 1960’s. Even the PalmBeachPost admits their city has long been a bed for
\norganized crime, although they forget to tell you that organized crime was taken over by the Feds
\ndecades ago. Private mobsters no longer exist, having been absorbed by the more powerful families
\nthat run the US government. As with all other business, the past 50 years has seen a monopolization of
\nall lucrative operations by \u201cinvestment firms\u201d, \u201cholding companies\u201d and of course banks. Since these
\nbanks and other huge companies are fronts for the same few families, there is no longer any room for
\nmobsters or any of the rest of those people. They went extinct some time in the 1960’s. All the
\nGodfather movies and Soprano shows are just misdirection to make you think organized crime still
\nexists in the old way. It doesn’t. They have found ways to steal much larger sums of money without
\ngetting their hands dirty or their names in the paper\u2014with absolutely no risk of getting caught. They
\ndo it by stealing from you under the aegis of the Federal government.<\/p>\n

Anyway, so that is who funded the Hawking impostor after 1985. But why? Well, we have seen all
\nsorts of weirdness afoot in physics and other science since then. I haven’t made up this weirdness, you
\nknow, I just circle it and comment on it. See my paper on Hawking’s Brave New World, if you haven’t
\nalready. See my paper on Y uri Milner and the Fundamental Physics Prize. See my paper on the Higgs
\nBoson announcement, which I show was faked from the ground up. See my paper on Alan Guth and
\nthe faked gravity wave research and promotion which preceded his 2014 Kavli Prize. Well, the reason
\nfor all this weirdness is the reason for all the other weirdnesses in the Modern world: money. Physics
\nhas become a giant cash cow, milked straight from the various national treasuries by the usual suspects.
\nHundreds of billions of dollars are siphoned from the people of Europe, China, Russia, and the
\nAmericas via these fake programs. And Hawking was an important PR personality in the early 1980’s,
\none they didn’t want to lose. He was a top salesman of their various boondoggles, and he became an
\neven better salesman once he was replaced by an impostor. Once he was replaced, his puppeteers had
\ncomplete control over the product they were creating, with no fear that the real Hawking might develop
\nscruples.<\/p>\n

Remember, this is exactly what they did in art in the 20th century. They got rid of all the real artists and
\nreplaced them with impostors. The scheme was slightly different, in that they didn’t replace Rodin and
\nMonet and Whistler with look-alikes in 1900. Instead, they just replaced the entire field with their
\nown manufactured mannequins over a generation or two. But the Modern artists have been impostors
\none way or the other. They certainly aren’t artists by the old definitions, since they can’t create anything
\nbeautiful or interesting. They are just PR personalities, the faces that front the fakery.<\/p>\n

In the very same way, physics has been taken over. Just as the Modern artists are incapable of real art,
\nthe Modern physicists are incapable of real physics. So instead they manufacture some huge pile of
\nequations that seems (to some gullible people) to resemble physics or math, and then sell it to Congress
\nor Parliament as cutting-edge. The important thing is not that any physics or art gets done, but that
\nmoney flows from the treasury. It is all a colossal scam, of earth-shattering proportions. And I mean
\nthat literally. All the societies of this Earth are being shattered by this rampant fakery. They are
\ncoming apart at the seams. Not only are they being milked dry of all revenues\u2014revenues that could
\nand should be going to real programs\u2014but they are being milked dry of all inspiration, all creativity, all
\ngood will, and all belief in humanity. Human potential is shriveling up like a spider on a hot sidewalk
\nunder a magnifying glass, and these rich families are the magnifying glass.<\/p>\n

It has to stop. It has gotten so bad, the rich are actually undercutting themselves. For money to be
\nworth anything there has to be something worth buying. The rich can no longer collect art, since they
\nhave destroyed it. They can no longer have the joy of underwriting real science, since they have
\ndestroyed it. They can’t collect books or poetry, since they have destroyed both literature and poetry.
\nThey can’t enjoy the company of innocent youths, since they have destroyed the innocence of youth.
\nThey can’t enjoy love, because they have destroyed it for profit. They can’t enjoy beautiful
\narchitecture, because they have destroyed it. And they can’t enjoy the feeling of a day well spent,
\nbecause their days aren’t well spent. That is the thing about dirty money and a dirty conscience: no
\nmatter how much you spend, you can’t hire someone to clean it.<\/p>\n

[I am rushing this into print with only a few days research, since I predict they will announce his death
\nvery very soon.]<\/p>\n

Addendum, April 22, 2015: Two days after this paper went up, there was an internet death hoax for
\nHawking. Someone got over a million hits at Facebook with this hoax. I read that two ways: 1) the
\nwidely publicized hoax acts to cover this paper a bit, because some will dismiss my title without
\nreading the paper, thinking it is linked to the hoax. For this reason, I assume the death hoax was started
\nby the same people that are behind the longterm Hawking hoax. 2) We have seen that these internet
\ndeath hoaxes often now precede a real death announcement. See the strange goings-on before the
\nannouncement of Robin Williams’ death (which I assume was faked like the rest). This confusion is
\ncreated on purpose, because it prevents most people from making any sense of the news. Confusing
\nnews prevents questions\u2014perhaps surprisingly\u2014because it causes most people’s brains to shut down.
\nYou would think confusing news would create questions, and in a few people it still does. But in the
\nmajority of people, very confusing news acts as its own shield. If enough confusion is created, the
\nreader or viewer will just see a tangled web he has no hope of unwinding, causing him to accept
\nwhatever he is told and \u201cmove on.\u201d For this reason, I will double down on my prediction that the real
\ndeath announcement of Hawking is coming soon. However, we know they are reading my papers, so
\nthey may stall just for the purpose of nixing my prediction. At any rate, my intuition tells me the
\nblonde impostor died recently and they are already stalling. Maybe they are looking for another
\nreplacement, who knows. I think it will be hard to find someone who looked like the blonde impostor
\ndid at the end.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Addendum, April 25 2015: We already have new evidence for my claim that the Hawking impostor is
\nalso dead, in that his current appearances are via hologram. Last night he appeared in Sydney via
\nhologram, but these 3D images cannot be confirmed to be live. Like any other images, holograms can
\nbe taped and played back later. I will be told he responds to live questions, but that can be explained in
\nany number of ways, included planted questions. But even if we assume or prove the questions are live
\nand not planted, the responses of Hawking all have to be interpreted, which allows for any amount of
\ntrickery. From visual and aural clues alone, there is no way to tell what Hawking is responding to,
\nwhich you will have to admit is convenient.<\/p>\n

There is now a follow-up to this paper from 2018. At that time, the Daily Mail in London published a
\npiece based on my research here and admitted I was right.\u00a0Two months later MI5\/6 retired the project,
\nwith the announcement of Hawking’s death, 33 years late.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

THIS IS A COPY AND PASTE POST, BUT LET’S ALL TRY TO SPREAD GOOD INFORMATION FAR AND WIDE<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

It\u2019s the dark ages now and shit is different. After using the internet for over 25 years, these days I keep finding bookmarks I go back to seem to have disappeared \u2013 it\u2019s not just Fakebook and Twatter that are censoring everything \u2013 the whole internet is being purged of real information, and flooded with propaganda.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Despite living in the globalist puppet state of New Zealand, I still have a large server space that can\u2019t easily be censored, so I\u2019m in a unique position to be able to share good content here on my blog, and I’m aiming to keep doing so. This blog is non-profit, and I’m just aiming to spread information around.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

One shift in mindset that I think we all need to do, is to let go of ideas like \u201ccopyright\u201d and all that outdated shit. We are all on the internet, anyone can copy and paste anything in seconds. I have over 1000 web pages of original content online that anyone can copy and repost. Good! \u2013 I hope they do. (a link back to https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz<\/a> is always appreciated)<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

If you are the author of something I have reposted here and would like me to remove it, feel free to email me. I\u2019ll happily take it down. If you are some lawyer threatening to sue me for copyright infringement on the other hand \u2013 your reply is in the mail\u2026<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Miles Mathis has written hundreds of essays, including some of the best researched content I have ever found online. It is all on his website http:\/\/mileswmathis.com so why on earth would I be re-posting any of his content? (And no, I haven’t asked him for permission) – Simply because his way of posting everything as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":27826,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Screenshot-from-2023-05-03-17-39-09.png","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":29257,"url":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/funny\/siftings-from-august\/","url_meta":{"origin":27821,"position":0},"title":"SIFTINGS #03 \u2013 ALL MY QUICKIE POSTS FROM AUGUST 2023","date":"August 31, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"As part of my ongoing experiments with testing out alternative platforms for blogging, in an attempt to get around Google's relentless blacklisting, I have been posting some short posts on a new Blogger account www.sift.co.nz (in the belly of the beast!) This is my third WordPress compilation post containing some\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "CONSPIRACIES"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/20th-century-hoax1000.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":29439,"url":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/observations\/what-am-i-aiming-to-achieve-by-posting-stuff-on-the-internet\/","url_meta":{"origin":27821,"position":1},"title":"WHAT AM I AIMING TO ACHIEVE BY POSTING STUFF ON THE INTERNET?","date":"December 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"We all tend to think we understand what is going on, and all the people who are levels behind ourselves in this multi level learning game are retarded. Which they are. But each time we move up a level, our old self appears retarded, compared with our present self. And\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "BLOGGING"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/build-entry-level-gaming-pc.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":29841,"url":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/funny\/siftings-06-my-quickie-posts-from-december-2023\/","url_meta":{"origin":27821,"position":2},"title":"SIFTINGS #06 \u2013 MY QUICKIE POSTS FROM DECEMBER 2023","date":"December 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This is last one of these compilations of my www.sift.co.nz posts I'll be doing - from now on I'm planning to make this FROT blog an archive and only post my new posts on SIFT. But to finish off 2023 here are my SIFT posts from December! MERRY XMAS TO\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "ART BY FROT"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/angry-santa-claus-rk-scaled.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":12522,"url":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/conspiracies\/is-michael-j-fox-faking-parkinsons\/","url_meta":{"origin":27821,"position":3},"title":"Is Michael J Fox faking Parkinson's?","date":"December 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Sometimes I really want to write about freaky shit, but I can't be arsed getting to in great depth because I'm a bit slack. And what I've just been having a look at today is Michael J Fox - and his fake Parkinson's. Up until now I never gave it\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "CONSPIRACIES"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/fox-500x262.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":26246,"url":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/observations\/seven-days-in-the-dogbox\/","url_meta":{"origin":27821,"position":4},"title":"SEVEN DAYS IN THE DOGBOX","date":"February 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Like most people who have been on the internet since the dawn of time, I have set up accounts on every social media platform known to man (or more accurately, known to AI bots) and over the years have come to see the shortcomings in every one of them. Once,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "AMERICA"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/31225546570.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":24705,"url":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/conspiracies\/conspiracy-sites-revisited\/","url_meta":{"origin":27821,"position":5},"title":"CONSPIRACY SITES REVISITED","date":"November 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Back in 2016 when I was enthusiastically jumping into the \"conspiracy\" rabbit hole I compiled a list of conspiracy sites as a blog post. These days I'm much more wary of alt media sources and now think many if not most of them are deep state assets acting as controlled\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "CONSPIRACIES"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/mooned.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27821"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27821"}],"version-history":[{"count":25,"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27821\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29021,"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27821\/revisions\/29021"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.frot.co.nz\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}